What to do if anticipatory bail is rejected in 498A?

by , Published on
» Home » Indian law » Criminal law » IPC » What to do if anticipatory bail is rejected in 498A?

Anticipatory bail is a legal provision that allows an individual to seek pre-arrest bail in anticipation of being accused of a crime. 

I am Supriya Gill, a lawyer and in this article, we will explore what steps can be taken if anticipatory bail is rejected in a 498A case, and what legal options are available to the accused.

If anticipatory bail is rejected in a 498A case, the accused can still apply for regular bail. The accused can also challenge the rejection of anticipatory bail in a higher court, such as the High Court or Supreme Court. Additionally, it is important to seek the guidance of a competent lawyer who can assist in exploring legal options and building a strong defence.

To know more about remedies available if your anticipatory bail is rejected in the 498A case, read the full article.


What to do if Anticipatory Bail is Rejected in 498A?


If an anticipatory bail application is rejected in a 498A case, there are several options available to the accused, including:

  1. Seek legal advice

The accused should seek the advice of a competent criminal lawyer to guide them on the best course of action. 

The lawyer can provide legal counsel, draft the bail application, and represent the accused in court.

  1. File a regular bail application

The accused can file a regular bail application before the concerned court after the rejection of their anticipatory bail application.

  1. Approach a higher court

If the anticipatory bail application has been rejected by a lower court, the accused can approach a higher court, such as the High Court, for relief.

The accused should file the appeal as soon as possible, as delay can work against the accused.

  1. Challenge the rejection of anticipatory bail

The accused can challenge the rejection of their anticipatory bail application by filing a revision petition or a writ petition before a higher court. 

  1. Surrender before the court

If the accused anticipates that he will be arrested, he can choose to surrender before the court, which may grant him bail. 

Surrendering shows that the accused is willing to cooperate with the investigation and is not a flight risk.

It is essential to understand that the rejection of an anticipatory bail application does not necessarily mean that the accused will be convicted.

They still have the right to defend themselves and seek legal remedies available to them.


Reasons for Rejection of Anticipatory Bail in 498A Cases


There are several reasons why an anticipatory bail application may be rejected in a 498A case, some of which are:

  1. Failure to prove innocence

The court may reject an anticipatory bail application if the accused fails to establish their innocence or provide evidence that proves their innocence in the 498A case.

  1. Failure to demonstrate that bail is necessary

The court may reject an anticipatory bail application if the accused fails to demonstrate that their arrest is not necessary for the investigation of the 498A case.

  1. Misrepresentation of facts

The court may reject an anticipatory bail application if the accused has misrepresented the facts or concealed relevant information in their application.

  1. Previous criminal record

If the accused has a previous criminal record, the court may reject their anticipatory bail application.

  1. Other factors

The court may also consider other factors such as the severity of the offence, the likelihood of the accused absconding, or the potential threat posed to the victim or witnesses, before rejecting an anticipatory bail application in a 498A case.


Judgements On anticipatory bail


Sameer Narayanrao Paltewar v. State of Maharashtra

The judgment addresses an important point regarding anticipatory bail.

In many cases, individuals facing potential arrest are not provided with a protective order under Section 438(4) of the CrPC for a reasonable period of time when requested by the Sessions Court.

This lack of protection puts the accused’s freedom at risk and increases the likelihood of arrest.

However, the recent judgment now requires that applicants be protected from any negative consequences resulting from the requirement to be present in person.

This requirement for protection provides greater security for the public as a whole.

Source


Conclusion


The rejection of an anticipatory bail application in a 498A case can be a challenging situation for the accused. 

However, there are several options available to them, such as filing a regular bail application, challenging the rejection of anticipatory bail, surrendering before the court, or seeking legal advice.

Seeking the advice of a competent criminal lawyer is highly recommended in such situations. 

The accused still have the right to defend themselves and seek legal remedies available to them.


Like This Post? Checkout More

Photo of author

Supriya Gill

Supriya Gill is the founder of Nomadic Lawyer where she provides legal insights on all the Indian, US, and Foreign laws. Supriya Gill is a licensed Indian lawyer with expertise in Family laws and corporate laws specifically. She has conducted legal research for various clients. Supriya Gill has a bachelor's degree in Law (B.A. LL.B.) from Guru Nanak Dev University Amritsar in 2022. Supriya Gill has a postgraduate diploma in Contract Drafting, Negotiation, and Dispute resolution from Law Sikho which is an online Legal education platform. Additionally, Supriya Gill completed her postgraduate diploma in GST from Parul University, Varodra, Gujrat, in 2021. Supriya Gill has also conducted legal research on family law cases and assisted senior counsels in drafting pleadings in District Court.

You can also contact me at supriyagill97@gmail.com